Differences in Result of Batchmode vs Interactive
Posted: 16.11.2018 14:50
Hi,
at the moment I am dealing with a strange situation - the result of the batchrun seems to miss a final step which seems to be
happening in interactive mode.
Some pictures of deep stacks from ~300 RAW input files have sort of unusable/stackable border, which is automatically removed in interactive mode.
so the result from BATCH mode is sized ( as original 6000x4000 )
while the interactive mode is sized ( 5964x3996) -> seems to be cropped and zoomed to not contain the errors!
The usable area would NOT correspond to manually cropping the usable area ( would be much smaller).
As a consequence of this I cannot use batchmode at the moment as stitching problems because of different resolution/zoomlevel occur.
But I highly depend on BATCHMODE as any single image takes about 1h to be calculated....
0. How can I avoid the error in the border area?
1. How could I configure BATCHMODE to deliver identical results ?
( uploaded samples are reduced in size just to visualize the result)
at the moment I am dealing with a strange situation - the result of the batchrun seems to miss a final step which seems to be
happening in interactive mode.
Some pictures of deep stacks from ~300 RAW input files have sort of unusable/stackable border, which is automatically removed in interactive mode.
so the result from BATCH mode is sized ( as original 6000x4000 )
while the interactive mode is sized ( 5964x3996) -> seems to be cropped and zoomed to not contain the errors!
The usable area would NOT correspond to manually cropping the usable area ( would be much smaller).
As a consequence of this I cannot use batchmode at the moment as stitching problems because of different resolution/zoomlevel occur.
But I highly depend on BATCHMODE as any single image takes about 1h to be calculated....
0. How can I avoid the error in the border area?
1. How could I configure BATCHMODE to deliver identical results ?
( uploaded samples are reduced in size just to visualize the result)